Reed Ulery
  • Home
  • Musician
    • Performer
    • Conductor
    • Arranger
  • Educator
    • Portfolio >
      • Beginner's Guide to Drill Writing
    • Teaching Philosophy
    • Resumé
  • Gallery
  • Contact

Writing the Drill - 9

12/2/2019

 
Throughout my experience of writing my drill, I had a number of revelations and many problems to overcome. Here are some reflections on writing the Opener to Le Petit Prince:
  • ​I haven't been able to find a way to use Pyware or Envision to write the drill for this project as I do not have a license for either, so I will be using Micro Marching League (MML) as a placeholder
  • I've decided to use props to help frame the band and create an overarching (literally) soft background gesture for the opener
  • Looking at the audio file volume tracker, the peaks and valleys roughly outline the development, energy level, and activity of the arrangement
  • The production sheet method is definitely the way to go: great for keeping me organized and for balancing several priorities
  • As I learn more keyboard shortcuts for MML, the quicker and more natural the process becomes
    • This was also true when I was learning to work with Musescore, and I imagine a similar learning curve would apply to Pyware 
  • Even though MML is designed to be more of an online game than a legitimate drill design tool, it has some useful features to make the process more authentic
    • The "L" key highlights the longest path for a particular set, and this is a useful check on feasibility of drill
    • The ability to change facing and instrument carriage are also useful and makes the drill match closer to what I'd like to see on the field
    • The "Yardline Snap" function cleans blocks and lines, and in a real application, would make the dot charts much easier to read and march
    • Having an animation of marchers instead of just dots helps keep me visually organized and mindful of spacing for larger instruments
    • Animated transitions also help keep my focus on motion more than sets at times
      • This is an area where I definitely still need more development as a drill writer
  • The farther I get into the drill, the more I find myself departing from some ideas I listed in my production sheet
    • This isn't necessarily a bad thing, rather, it just acts as commentary on the effectiveness of my production sheet
  • The actual drill writing process is very time consuming
  • Since MML is not designed to function as a practical drill writing software, it has several limitations
    • Paths and direction of travel are not editable, so I have several instances where I would write a follow the leader, but the animation shows unrealistic cross throughs
    • Tempo is not editable in the traditional sense, rather, the length of each set is determined by the time it takes for the longest path to complete
      • This has made it extra difficult to match some smoother, shorter motions to music
    • MML lacks the capability to show half time strides, so I've had to visualize these on my own
    • There is no option to stagger entrances without making more sets, so in places where subsets or simply written instructions would have been effective, I cannot view the results here
    • All sets are created sequentially in MML, so I only had the option to start at the beginning with set 1 and work to the end
  • Drill writing is an extremely time consuming endeavor
    • The editing process was cut short due to my time constraints, but this part is almost equally as detail oriented and time consuming
  • Combining a video of the final production with an audio recording was quite tedious and had to be manually completed with each set
    • This process was further complicated by the multiple tempi and time signatures in my arrangement
    • If I were to use purpose-built drill writing software, this would have been something to set up beforehand that would have helped with the writing process itself
  • Overall Strengths:
    • I did a decent job catering to the many demands, both practical and artistic, I outlined in my preparation process
    • My preparation before writing was thorough enough that I rarely had to go back and rethink things as I was actually charting dots
    • I picked up on the keyboard shortcuts, strengths, and limitations of the MML medium rather quickly and used them to my benefit
    • I was able to incorporate some picture-based and motif-based ideas into the drill
      • Ex. Prince in scarf from book cover at Set 9, 0:43; rose fading during transition from Set 10 to Set 11, 0:58-1:06
    • I incorporated some extended techniques like body visuals, instrument carriage, and half time marching
      • Some of these are visible in the animation, some aren't due to MML's limitations
  • Overall Weaknesses:
    • Transitioning between different staging schema was quite a bit more involved than I expected
    • I need to develop more finesse in matching visual speed with energy level of the music
    • I can still transition more towards motion-based thinking and away from set-based thinking
    • The winds, percussion, and guard largely remained as separate captions; I would have liked to integrate them a bit more
    • I did not effectively estimate the time it would take to complete this portion of the project, so I did not have enough time left to edit the drill to the level I would have liked to

Comments are closed.

    Project Journal

    On this page, I will periodically post as I work through this professional development project. I plan to include some summary of my work, any roadblocks or breakthroughs, and reflections on the research, experimentation, and development of this project. 

    Home
    Process
    Materials
    Journal
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • Musician
    • Performer
    • Conductor
    • Arranger
  • Educator
    • Portfolio >
      • Beginner's Guide to Drill Writing
    • Teaching Philosophy
    • Resumé
  • Gallery
  • Contact